Iwo Jami was an important objective for the American military because?

Posted on May 30th, 2010 by admin in taft independent | 4 Comments »

1) the Japaneses were using it as a base to attack the U.S
2)the main Japaneses navel force was stationed there
3)the U.S planes could bomb japan from there
4)the islands were an important link in the Japanese supply lines

Theodore Roosevelt tried to win the republican nomination from William Howard Taft in the 1912 election because he believed that Taft…

1) did not deal with trusts aggressively enough
2) had failed to live up to progressive ideals
3) could not defeat Woodrow Wilson
4) was too slow in pushing for tariff reform

the Philippines are now?
1)an American protectorate
2) an American commonwealth
3)an unincorporated U.S territory
4) an independent country

If you take all the US military deaths from both Iraq and Afghanistan, and have them take place on an island not 5 miles at its widest point…and do it in a few weeks time…THAT was Iwo Jima.

Please give respect to the men who fought and died there by doing just a few minutes of reading on it.

can someone help me with these ive looked all over the book but i just cant seem to find them.?

Posted on February 20th, 2010 by admin in taft independent | 1 Comment »

1. Under imperialism, strong nations attempted to (1 point)
control weaker nations.
prevent immigration.
avoid contact with the outside world.
decrease the size of the military.
2. Which of the following was a factor in the growth of imperialism? (1 point)
the shortage of manufactured products
the military threat from groups of smaller nations
the need for natural resources
the desire to learn from the cultures of other nations
3. An event leading to the Spanish-American War was (1 point)
a rebellion in Puerto Rico.
a rebellion in Cuba.
Spanish attack on the Philippines.
Spain’s annexation of the Hawaiian islands.
4. As a result of its victory in the Spanish-American War, the United States gained (1 point)
important ports in Mexico.
Panama.
Puerto Rico and the Philippines.
a large section of China.
5. Theodore Roosevelt believed in (1 point)
an aggressive foreign policy.
a cautious foreign policy.
no American involvement overseas.
economic, but not military, intervention.
6. A main goal of the Panama Canal was to (1 point)
help Latin American economies become more independent.
improve relations between the United States and Colombia.
help European nations trade with Latin America.
allow the American Navy to move quickly from ocean to ocean.
7. In Asia, Roosevelt worked to (1 point)
limit American military power.
cause conflicts between other nations.
keep markets open for American goods.
keep markets closed to American goods.
8. President Taft believed in (1 point)
promoting American investment in foreign economies.
sending troops to support American policies.
avoiding all overseas involvement.
limiting business investment overseas.
9. After the Spanish-American War, opposition to imperialism (1 point)
decreased.
grew stronger.
grew only within the government.
was based on the need for new markets.
10. Anti-imperialists believed imperialism was based on (1 point)
racism.
ideals of liberty.
democracy.
humanitarian beliefs.

I’ll try:

1)control weaker nations
2)shortage of manufactured products
3)a rebellion in Cuba
4)Puerto Rico and the Philippines
5)an agressive foreign policy
6)allow american Navy to move quickly from ocean to ocean
7)Keep markets open for American goods
8)Promoting American investment overseas(I think)
9)grew stronger
10)racism (i think)

I attempted all the answers. I am not really sure on all my answers. I hoped I helped.

need some help on some questions?

Posted on February 18th, 2010 by admin in taft independent | 1 Comment »

6. A main goal of the Panama Canal was to
help Latin American economies become more independent.
improve relations between the United States and Colombia.
help European nations trade with Latin America.
allow the American Navy to move quickly from ocean to ocean.

7. In Asia, Roosevelt worked to
limit American military power.
cause conflicts between other nations.
keep markets open for American goods.
keep markets closed to American goods.

8. President Taft believed in
promoting American investment in foreign economies.
sending troops to support American policies.
avoiding all overseas involvement.
limiting business investment overseas.

9. After the Spanish-American War, opposition to imperialism
decreased.
grew stronger.
grew only within the government.
was based on the need for new markets.

10. Anti-imperialists believed imperialism was based on
racism.
ideals of liberty.
democracy.
humanitarian beliefs.

6) the 3rd one
7) the 1st one
8) no idea srry dont know who Taft is
9) the 2nd one
10) dont know the answer. although, process of ellimination shows its not the 1st or 3rd choice

HOPE I HELPED =D

Does this sound familiar from the 2008 Presidential election?

Posted on February 15th, 2010 by admin in taft independent | 3 Comments »

Who can we compare this scenario to?

http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?a=37

Many of Taft’s contemporaries dismissed him as an “isolationist” in foreign policy (for good examples, see Schlesinger 1952 and Van Dyke and Davis 1952). Although subsequent scholarship has suggested that this characterization was highly misleading (Berger 1967, 1971, 1975; West 1952), Taft was isolationist if isolationism is defined, following careful scholarship, as “an attitude of opposition to binding commitments by the United States government that would create new, or expand existing, obligations to foreign nations” (Rieselbach 1966, 7). Like many Americans of his era, Taft did not welcome the intrusion of foreign policy and gladly would have “let the rest of the world go its own way if it would only go without bothering the United States” (Osgood 1953, 433). For much of his career, Taft advocated what he called “the policy of the free hand,” whereby the United States would avoid entangling alliances and interference in foreign disputes. This policy permitted government leaders the freedom of action to decide in particular cases whether a sufficiently vital U.S. interest warranted involvement (Taft 1951, 12).[1]

The real problem with the term isolationism is not that it misrepresented Taft’s general orientation, but rather that it permitted defenders of various Roosevelt and Truman policies to discredit Taft without having to engage his arguments seriously. Labeling opponents of administration policies as “isolationists” implied that they were naive, like ostriches with their heads buried in the sand, nostalgic for an earlier era in which the United States could hide behind the safety of two oceans and avoid involvement in international affairs (Doenecke 1979, 11–12; Graebner 1968).[2] In reality, however, none of the members of the isolationist wing of the Republican Party ever believed it possible for the United States to isolate itself from the rest of the world, and so all of them accordingly rejected that label.
Tony, indeed. Funny you should say that, because Taft was a Repubican. In fact his nickname was Mr. Republican.

The good doctor isn’t one to mince words. Hence the title: "R3volution"

1. Under imperialism, strong nations attempted to?

Posted on February 13th, 2010 by admin in taft independent | 2 Comments »

control weaker nations.
prevent immigration.
avoid contact with the outside world.
decrease the size of the military.

2. Which of the following was a factor in the growth of imperialism? (1 point)
the shortage of manufactured products
the military threat from groups of smaller nations
the need for natural resources
the desire to learn from the cultures of other nations

3. An event leading to the Spanish-American War was (1 point)
a rebellion in Puerto Rico.
a rebellion in Cuba.
Spanish attack on the Philippines.
Spain’s annexation of the Hawaiian islands.

4. As a result of its victory in the Spanish-American War, the United States gained (1 point)
important ports in Mexico.
Panama.
Puerto Rico and the Philippines.
a large section of China.

5. Theodore Roosevelt believed in (1 point)
an aggressive foreign policy.
a cautious foreign policy.
no American involvement overseas.
economic, but not military, intervention.

6. A main goal of the Panama Canal was to (1 point)
help Latin American economies become more independent.
improve relations between the United States and Colombia.
help European nations trade with Latin America.
allow the American Navy to move quickly from ocean to ocean.

7. In Asia, Roosevelt worked to (1 point)
limit American military power.
cause conflicts between other nations.
keep markets open for American goods.
keep markets closed to American goods.

8. President Taft believed in (1 point)
promoting American investment in foreign economies.
sending troops to support American policies.
avoiding all overseas involvement.
limiting business investment overseas.

9. After the Spanish-American War, opposition to imperialism (1 point)
decreased.
grew stronger.
grew only within the government.
was based on the need for new markets.

10. Anti-imperialists believed imperialism was based on (1 point)
racism.
ideals of liberty.
democracy.
humanitarian beliefs.

Responses saved. The final score is 7/10 (70%).

1.
Under imperialism, strong nations attempted to (1 point)

* Correct answer (1 pt) control weaker nations.
* Unselected answer (0 pts) prevent immigration.
* Unselected answer (0 pts) avoid contact with the outside world.
* Unselected answer (0 pts) decrease the size of the military.

1 /1 point
2.
Which of the following was a factor in the growth of imperialism? (1 point)

* Unselected answer (0 pts) the shortage of manufactured products
* Unselected answer (0 pts) the military threat from groups of smaller nations
* Correct answer (1 pt) the need for natural resources
* Unselected answer (0 pts) the desire to learn from the cultures of other nations

1 /1 point
3.
An event leading to the Spanish-American War was (1 point)

* Unselected answer (0 pts) a rebellion in Puerto Rico.
* Correct answer (1 pt) a rebellion in Cuba.
* Unselected answer (0 pts) Spanish attack on the Philippines.
* Unselected answer (0 pts) Spain’s annexation of the Hawaiian islands.

1 /1 point
4.
As a result of its victory in the Spanish-American War, the United States gained (1 point)

* Unselected answer (0 pts) important ports in Mexico.
* Unselected answer (0 pts) Panama.
* Correct answer (1 pt) Puerto Rico and the Philippines.
* Unselected answer (0 pts) a large section of China.

1 /1 point
5.
Theodore Roosevelt believed in (1 point)

* Unselected answer (1 pt) an aggressive foreign policy.
* Unselected answer (0 pts) a cautious foreign policy.
* Incorrect Answer (0 pts) no American involvement overseas.
* Unselected answer (0 pts) economic, but not military, intervention.

0 /1 point
6.
A main goal of the Panama Canal was to (1 point)

* Unselected answer (0 pts) help Latin American economies become more independent.
* Unselected answer (0 pts) improve relations between the United States and Colombia.
* Unselected answer (0 pts) help European nations trade with Latin America.
* Correct answer (1 pt) allow the American Navy to move quickly from ocean to ocean.

1 /1 point
7.
In Asia, Roosevelt worked to (1 point)

* Unselected answer (0 pts) limit American military power.
* Unselected answer (0 pts) cause conflicts between other nations.
* Correct answer (1 pt) keep markets open for American goods.
* Unselected answer (0 pts) keep markets closed to American goods.

1 /1 point
8.
President Taft believed in (1 point)

* Unselected answer (1 pt) promoting American investment in foreign economies.
* Unselected answer (0 pts) sending troops to support American policies.
* Incorrect Answer (0 pts) avoiding all overseas involvement.
* Unselected answer (0 pts) limiting business investment overseas.

0 /1 point
9.
After the Spanish-American War, opposition to imperialism (1 point)

* Unselected answer (0 pts) decreased.
* Unselected answer (1 pt) grew stronger.
* Unselected answer (0 pts) grew only within the government.
* Incorrect Answer (0 pts) was based on the need for new markets.

0 /1 point
10.
Anti-imperialists believed imperialism was based on (1 point)

* Correct answer (1 pt) racism.
* Unselected answer (0 pts) ideals of liberty.
* Unselected answer (0 pts) democracy.
* Unselected answer (0 pts) humanitarian beliefs.

1 /1 point

IS Obama the next FDR ?

Posted on February 11th, 2010 by admin in taft independent | 12 Comments »

Determined to overcome the opposition of conservative Democrats in Congress (mostly from the South), Roosevelt involved himself in the 1938 Democratic primaries, actively campaigning for challengers who were more supportive of New Deal reform. His targets denounced Roosevelt for trying to take over the Democratic party and used the argument that they were independent to win reelection. Roosevelt failed badly, managing to defeat only one target, a conservative Democrat from New York City. [21]

In the November 1938 election, Democrats lost six Senate seats and 71 House seats. Losses were concentrated among pro-New Deal Democrats. When Congress reconvened in 1939, Republicans under Ohio Senator Robert A. Taft formed a Conservative coalition with Southern Democrats, virtually ending Roosevelt’s ability to get his domestic proposals enacted into law. The minimum wage law of 1938 was the last substantial New Deal reform act passed by Congress. [22]
From an article at Citizendium
Thank you Russian 12 ——-"Those that ignore history are doomed to repeat it" —But you knew that already didnt you.
Not going to happen Kevin , Obama is in almost the exact political quagmire after only 9 months where FDR didnt hit the wall until his 6th year . If not for the onset of WW2 FDR would have never had a third term . WW2 saved FDR much the same as JFK was LBJ’s salvation .

Interesting. Obama is no FDR & despite almost complete media control, he’ll never get the power FDR wielded. But the losses FDR incurred despite his involvement, well, I think we’ll see that..starting right here in NJ next week.

Career cover letters help?

Posted on October 12th, 2009 by admin in taft independent | 2 Comments »

I’m applying for a part time job for the very first time [oh yes special moment! xDD]
my english teacher highly recommended that i attach a cover letter to my application,
so i was wondering what should i include in it?
and also what do i even write about o.o’
i attempted to write one and this is what i have,
"Dear Sir or Madam,
My name is Jose Romero. I am currently an 8th grader at Taft Middle school and will be graduating this June. I heard you where hiring from your website, I am interested in joining your company. I’ve gone to your store several times and I believe that if I get a job it would be good experience for a first time job.
Although I have never had a job before, I would like to let you know that I am a loyal, independent, and responsible person. "
i have no clue where to go from here pleas help ASAP D=

OH btw i am applying to market places as a
[first job i want] sushi maker
[second job i want] clerck/stocker
[i'll settle for this xD ] and a cashier
I’m 15 [started school late xDD]
and in CA the legal age for getting a job is 14 so yeah.. xDD

My biggest worry is that you are not old enough to be hired :(

But I like your cover letter. It is sincere and it doesn’t apologize for not having worked – you state it just like the fact that it is, and you offer very good reasons to hire you.

You might want to put why you’re good for the company, or why you like the company specifically, instead of or in addition to why it would be good for *you* to work there. Frankly they’re probably more interested in what’s good for them than for you, at this point :)

(p.s. the word "were" is misspelled "where", though)

Best of luck!

pps. I don’t think sushi maker is a very easy job to get :(

Labor Unions are at an all-time low in popularity. Why doesn’t the GOP have the guts to stand up to them?

Posted on September 20th, 2009 by admin in taft independent | 10 Comments »

http://www.gallup.com/poll/122744/Labor-Unions-Sharp-Slide-Public-Support.aspx

48% of Americans now approve of labor unions, according to Gallup’s latest poll. This is the fewest since Gallup began polling in the 1930s (when labor unions first became significant after they gained the backing of the federal government thanks to FDR’s Wagner Act).

Prior to this year, the lowest all-time support for union thugs was in 1979 and 1981.

Although unions are less popular across partisan lines, the biggest drop has been amongst the increasingly libertarian-leaning Independents.

Most people now understand what economists have long understood, that labor unions help their own workers at the expense of non-union workers. Unions, in order to prop up their own wages, must create an artificial scarcity of workers, which harms those whom the unions run out of the labor market (this is why labor unions have been so enthusiastic over the years in supporting minimum wage laws and restrictions on how much young people can work, even though union workers are paid well above minimum wage, as this takes away the threat of employers replacing union members with a greater number of unskilled workers; in South Africa, all-white unions were instrumental in bringing about apartheid to protect themselves against competition from black workers).

If the Republican Party wishes to win over the large number of Americans who want to get rid of union thuggery, they need only support repealing the federal laws that enable labor unions to operate. If the Wagner-Taft-Hartley Act were to be repealed (and all other federal labor legislation) and the status quo prior to FDR restored, the invisible hand of the free market will run these criminal cartels called unions out of business. To get rid of unions in the public sector, the GOP need only eliminate the public sector jobs (in the case of vital government services, the GOP should refuse to deal with the union when the contract expires, the union will go on strike, and then the union workers can be replaced with "scabs," permanently deunionizing the public sector as well).

Furthermore, the GOP stands to benefit politically from weakening labor unions. Unions tend to fund the Democratic Party and other leftist organizations. By reducing the amount of money that the Democrats have to air ads, the GOP would increase its own influence.

It is possible for a Republican majority backed up by a Republican president (as it seems increasingly likely that we will soon have) to end labor unions once and for all as a force in this country. Why don’t the Republicans have the courage to stand up to organized crime?

This administration is bringing many things to light most people were oblivious to. I see changes coming in the future away from socialist and fascist ideologies. America will possibly be what America was meant to be again.

3. Mystery Babylon – Texe Marrs NWO

Posted on September 14th, 2009 by admin in taft independent | 17 Comments »

3. Mystery Babylon – Texe Marrs NWO

http://www.texemarrs.com/

New World Order
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/newworldindex.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Order_(conspiracy)

911 Was a Mossad False Flag Operation
http://www.rense.com/general21/was911mossad.htm

The International Jew —
The World’s Foremost Problem
Originally Published By Henry Ford

Many people have seen the booklet.

These are the original articles that
appeared in the Dearborn Independent.

By Henry Ford, founder of the Ford Motor Company,
and the editors of THE DEARBORN INDEPENDENT.

Vol. 1 The International Jew

1 The Jew in Character and Business

2 Germany’s Reaction Against the Jew

3 Jewish History in the United States

4 The Jewish Question — Fact or Fancy?

5 Anti-Semitism — Will It Appear in the U.S.?

6 Jewish Question Breaks Into the Magazines

7 Arthur Brisbane Leaps to the Help of Jewry

8 Does a Definite Jewish World Program Exist?

9 The Historic Basis of Jewish Imperialism

10 An Introduction to the “Jewish Protocols”

11 “Jewish” Estimate of Gentile Human Nature

12 “Jewish Protocols” Claim Partial Fulfillment

13 “Jewish” Plan to Split Society by “Ideas”

14 Did the Jews Foresee the World War?

15 Is the Jewish “Kahal” the Modern “Soviet”?

16 How the “Jewish Question” Touches the Farm

17 Does Jewish Power Control the World Press?

18 Does This Explain Jewish Political Power?

19 The All-Jewish Mark on “Red Russia”

20 Jewish Testimony in Favor of Bolshevism

Vol. 2 Jewish Activities in the United States

21 How Jews in the U.S. Conceal Their Strength

22 Jewish Testimony on “Are Jews a Nation?”

23 Jew Versus Non-Jew in New York Finance

24 The High and Low of Jewish Money Power

25 “Disraeli of America” — A Jew of Super-Power

26 The Scope of Jewish Dictatorship in the U.S.

27 Jewish Copper Kings Reap Rich War-Profits

28 Jewish Control of the American Theater

29 The Rise of the First Jewish Theatrical Trust

30 How Jews Capitalized a Protest Against Jews

31 The Jewish Aspect of the “Movie” Problem

32 Jewish Supremacy in Motion Picture World

33 Rule of the Jewish Kehillah Grips New York

34 The Jewish Demand for “Rights” in America

35 “Jewish Rights” Clash With American Rights

36 “Jewish Rights” to Put Studies Out of Schools

37 Disraeli — British Premier, Portrays the Jews

38 Taft Once Tried to Resist Jews — and Failed

39 When Editors Were Independent of the Jews

40 Why the Jews Dislike the Morgenthau Report

41 Jews Use the Peace Conference to Bind Poland

42 The Present Status of the Jewish Question

Vol. 3 Jewish Influences in American Life

43 The Jews and the “Religious Persecution” Cry

44 Are the Jews Victims or Persecutors?

45 Jewish Gamblers Corrupt American Baseball

46 Jewish Degradation of American Baseball

47 Jewish Jazz Becomes Our National Music

48 How the Jewish Song Trust Makes You Sing

49 Jewish Hot-Beds of Bolshevism in the U.S.

50 Jew Trades Link With World Revolutionaries

51 Will Jewish Zionism Bring Armageddon?

52 How the Jews Use Power — By an Eyewitness

53 How Jews Ruled and Ruined Tammany Hall

54 Jew Wires Direct Tammany’s Gentile Puppets

55 B’nai B’rith Leader Discusses the Jews

56 Dr. Levy, a Jew, Admits His People’s Error

57 Jewish Idea in American Monetary Affairs

58 Jewish Idea Molded Federal Reserve Plan

59 Jewish Idea of Central Bank for America

60 How Jewish International Finance Functions

61 Jewish Power and America’s Money Famine

Vol. 4 Aspects of Jewish Power in the United States

62 How Jews Gained American Liquor Control

63 Gigantic Jewish Liquor Trust and Its Career

64 The Jewish Element in Bootlegging Evil

65 Angles of Jewish Influence in American Life

66 The Jews’ Complaint Against “Americanism”

67 The Jewish ociates of Benedict Arnold

68 Benedict Arnold and Jewish Aid in Shady Deal

69 Arnold and His Jewish Aids at West Point

70 The Gentle Art of Changing Jewish Names

71 Jewish “Kol Nidre” and “Eli, Eli” Explained

72 Jews as New York Magistrates See Them

73 Jews Are Silent, the National Voice Is Heard

74 What Jews Attempted Where They Had Power

75 The Jewish Question in Current Testimony

76 America’s Jewish Enigma — Louis Marshall

77 The Economic Plans of International Jews

78 A Jew Sees His People As Others See Them

79 Candid Address to Jews on the Jewish Problem

80 An Address to “Gentiles” on the Jewish Problem

——————————————————————————–

Next chapter

http://iamthewitness.com

Duration : 0:10:0

Read the rest of this entry »

4. Mystery Babylon – Texe Marrs NWO

Posted on September 11th, 2009 by admin in taft independent | 15 Comments »

4. Mystery Babylon – Texe Marrs NWO

http://www.texemarrs.com/

New World Order
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/newworldindex.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Order_(conspiracy)

911 Was a Mossad False Flag Operation
http://www.rense.com/general21/was911mossad.htm

The International Jew —
The World’s Foremost Problem
Originally Published By Henry Ford

Many people have seen the booklet.

These are the original articles that
appeared in the Dearborn Independent.

By Henry Ford, founder of the Ford Motor Company,
and the editors of THE DEARBORN INDEPENDENT.

Vol. 1 The International Jew

1 The Jew in Character and Business

2 Germany’s Reaction Against the Jew

3 Jewish History in the United States

4 The Jewish Question — Fact or Fancy?

5 Anti-Semitism — Will It Appear in the U.S.?

6 Jewish Question Breaks Into the Magazines

7 Arthur Brisbane Leaps to the Help of Jewry

8 Does a Definite Jewish World Program Exist?

9 The Historic Basis of Jewish Imperialism

10 An Introduction to the “Jewish Protocols”

11 “Jewish” Estimate of Gentile Human Nature

12 “Jewish Protocols” Claim Partial Fulfillment

13 “Jewish” Plan to Split Society by “Ideas”

14 Did the Jews Foresee the World War?

15 Is the Jewish “Kahal” the Modern “Soviet”?

16 How the “Jewish Question” Touches the Farm

17 Does Jewish Power Control the World Press?

18 Does This Explain Jewish Political Power?

19 The All-Jewish Mark on “Red Russia”

20 Jewish Testimony in Favor of Bolshevism

Vol. 2 Jewish Activities in the United States

21 How Jews in the U.S. Conceal Their Strength

22 Jewish Testimony on “Are Jews a Nation?”

23 Jew Versus Non-Jew in New York Finance

24 The High and Low of Jewish Money Power

25 “Disraeli of America” — A Jew of Super-Power

26 The Scope of Jewish Dictatorship in the U.S.

27 Jewish Copper Kings Reap Rich War-Profits

28 Jewish Control of the American Theater

29 The Rise of the First Jewish Theatrical Trust

30 How Jews Capitalized a Protest Against Jews

31 The Jewish Aspect of the “Movie” Problem

32 Jewish Supremacy in Motion Picture World

33 Rule of the Jewish Kehillah Grips New York

34 The Jewish Demand for “Rights” in America

35 “Jewish Rights” Clash With American Rights

36 “Jewish Rights” to Put Studies Out of Schools

37 Disraeli — British Premier, Portrays the Jews

38 Taft Once Tried to Resist Jews — and Failed

39 When Editors Were Independent of the Jews

40 Why the Jews Dislike the Morgenthau Report

41 Jews Use the Peace Conference to Bind Poland

42 The Present Status of the Jewish Question

Vol. 3 Jewish Influences in American Life

43 The Jews and the “Religious Persecution” Cry

44 Are the Jews Victims or Persecutors?

45 Jewish Gamblers Corrupt American Baseball

46 Jewish Degradation of American Baseball

47 Jewish Jazz Becomes Our National Music

48 How the Jewish Song Trust Makes You Sing

49 Jewish Hot-Beds of Bolshevism in the U.S.

50 Jew Trades Link With World Revolutionaries

51 Will Jewish Zionism Bring Armageddon?

52 How the Jews Use Power — By an Eyewitness

53 How Jews Ruled and Ruined Tammany Hall

54 Jew Wires Direct Tammany’s Gentile Puppets

55 B’nai B’rith Leader Discusses the Jews

56 Dr. Levy, a Jew, Admits His People’s Error

57 Jewish Idea in American Monetary Affairs

58 Jewish Idea Molded Federal Reserve Plan

59 Jewish Idea of Central Bank for America

60 How Jewish International Finance Functions

61 Jewish Power and America’s Money Famine

Vol. 4 Aspects of Jewish Power in the United States

62 How Jews Gained American Liquor Control

63 Gigantic Jewish Liquor Trust and Its Career

64 The Jewish Element in Bootlegging Evil

65 Angles of Jewish Influence in American Life

66 The Jews’ Complaint Against “Americanism”

67 The Jewish ociates of Benedict Arnold

68 Benedict Arnold and Jewish Aid in Shady Deal

69 Arnold and His Jewish Aids at West Point

70 The Gentle Art of Changing Jewish Names

71 Jewish “Kol Nidre” and “Eli, Eli” Explained

72 Jews as New York Magistrates See Them

73 Jews Are Silent, the National Voice Is Heard

74 What Jews Attempted Where They Had Power

75 The Jewish Question in Current Testimony

76 America’s Jewish Enigma — Louis Marshall

77 The Economic Plans of International Jews

78 A Jew Sees His People As Others See Them

79 Candid Address to Jews on the Jewish Problem

80 An Address to “Gentiles” on the Jewish Problem

——————————————————————————–

Next chapter

http://iamthewitness.com

Duration : 0:10:0

Read the rest of this entry »